Evidence review

Civic space under pressure

An evidence framework for understanding restrictions affecting defenders, journalists and communities.

Research scope

An evidence framework for understanding restrictions affecting defenders, journalists and communities. This page records the public scope of a developing WHRF research stream; it does not present planned work as a completed report.

The inquiry begins by defining the human-rights question, the people and institutions concerned, the geographic and time boundaries, and the kinds of evidence that can support a responsible conclusion.

Method and evidence

The programme will prioritise primary documentation, recognised international standards and attributed regional expertise. Sources will be assessed for provenance, relevance and corroboration, with uncertainty made visible rather than hidden.

Research involving lived experience requires particular care. Any future collection of testimony or personal information will require an approved method, informed participation and safeguards proportionate to the potential risk.

Planned public record

Before substantive findings are presented, WHRF will publish the research question, authorship, method, source approach and limitations. Reviewed outputs will retain a clear distinction between evidence, analysis and recommendations.

  • Source catalogue and evidence map
  • Attributed expert and regional perspectives
  • Concise public briefing for non-specialist readers
  • Reviewed downloadable publication when complete
Discuss a research contribution
Stay informed

Follow the issues that shape human dignity.

Explore new briefings, regional analysis and research as WHRF’s public programme develops.

See what’s new