Research methodology

A method proportionate to the evidence.

WHRF research begins with a defined rights question, an explicit evidence plan and safeguards for the people whom the work may affect.

1. Define the question

Each project records its human-rights question, purpose, geography, time period, affected groups, intended users and exclusions. The design distinguishes descriptive questions, legal interpretation, causal claims and recommendations because each requires different evidence.

2. Map standards and stakeholders

The research maps applicable international, regional and domestic standards and identifies institutions, communities and expertise relevant to the question. Directory coverage or a public source alone is never treated as evidence of an operational WHRF relationship.

3. Build and appraise the evidence base

Sources are logged with provenance, date, access route, relevance and known limitations. Primary material is prioritised and important claims are corroborated where feasible. Statistics are traced to definitions and collection methods; translations and extracts are checked against their context.

4. Protect people and information

Before collecting personal information or testimony, WHRF assesses consent, necessity, data minimisation, security, retention and the possibility of retaliation or re-identification. A project does not proceed when the public value does not justify the residual risk.

5. Analyse with calibrated language

The analysis separates documented fact, reported allegation, interpretation and WHRF recommendation. Confidence is not inflated by the number of sources when those sources depend on the same underlying account. Alternative credible explanations and missing perspectives are recorded.

6. Review and publish

An accountable editor checks claim-to-source alignment, method, rights framing, potential harms and clarity. Specialist review is added when the subject requires it. Publications state authorship, dates, method, sources, limitations and status, with corrections handled under the editorial standards.

7. Revisit

Time-sensitive outputs are reviewed when material evidence changes. A review may confirm the analysis, add a dated update, correct it, supersede it or retire it while preserving an appropriate public record.

Frequently asked questions

Questions about WHRF research

Does every WHRF page use the same method?

No. The method is proportionate to the output. A source review, legal analysis, country briefing and original study require different evidence and review steps; each substantial publication should state the method it actually used.

How are gaps in evidence handled?

A gap is reported as a limitation, not filled with inference presented as fact. WHRF may identify what further documentation or expertise would be needed to answer the question responsibly.

Can outside experts contribute?

Yes. Relevant researchers, practitioners and people with lived experience may propose a contribution. Expertise, independence, safeguarding, attribution and conflicts are assessed before inclusion.

Stay informed

Follow the issues that shape human dignity.

Explore new briefings, regional analysis and research as WHRF’s public programme develops.

See what’s new